- Contribute
- Nebraska Bills to Watch
- LB19 Reduction of Marriage License Fees
- LB 34 Employee Verifciation for State Awarded Contract Jobs
- LB 200 Exempts Motorcyclists from Wearing Helmets
- LB 284 Limits Where Sex Offenders Can Live
- LB 382- Same Day Voter Registration
- LB 444- Requires Escorts to Be Licensed
- LB 594- Pre-Abortion Screening for Risk Factors
- LB 676 Women’s Right to Know
- LR6CA & LB 266 Allows slot machines “Racinos” in Nebraska
- LR10 Opposes the Federal EFCA
- LB 274- Allows for Work Camps & Restitution to Victims
- LB 306 Repeals the Death Penalty
- LB 443 S.O.B. Regulation
- LB36 Changes Execution Method
- LB 430 Concealed Handgun Permits
- LB 403- Prohibits Public Benefits to Illegal Aliens
- LB 67 Tax Credit for Private Education
- LB 675 Women’s Right to Know
- LB 694
- Get Involved
- Legislative Action
- Current Issues
- Church and State
- About Us
- Blog
- Poll
- City on a Hill
Hate Crimes Fact Sheet
Hate Crimes Fact Sheet
H.R. 1913 // Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009
There has been no dramatic rise in sexual orientation “hate crimes” in the United States.
- In 2007(the most recent year reported), out of 855,856 cases of reported aggravated assault, only 242 were allegedly motivated by sexual orientation bias - approximately 3 out of every ten thousand.
- Of the 7426 incidents of reported "hate crimes" in the U.S. in 2007(including race, religion, gender and all other categories), 1,265 (approximately 16.6 %) were classified as motivated by "sexual orientation" bias. 75% of that 1265 number fall into categories such as vandalism, name-calling, and pushing and shoving.
- Only 448 "simple assaults" (i.e., pushing and shoving) were reportedly from sexual orientation bias. The total number of simple assaults in the nation is so large that the FBI doesn't even keep track of them apart from "hate crimes."
- Almost 51% of all "hate crimes" are motivated by racial bias. The next largest category is religion, at 18.4%. Sexual orientation is third and is fairly steady over the years both in terms of percentage and in raw numbers. There definitely has been no dramatic rise in sexual orientation "hate crimes".
Hate crimes legislation treats victims of the same crime unequally under the law.
Although the 14th Amendment guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law, hate crimes legislation elevates some victims of violent crimes over others. If a person commits violence against a homosexual and the crime was found to be motivated by perceived bias against the victim’s sexual orientation, then the perpetrator will be charged with a “hate crime.” If the same violent crime is perpetrated on a child, the act would not classify as a “hate crime.”
Hate crimes legislation punishes thoughts, not actions.
Advocates of hate crimes legislation argue that the bill only authorizes prosecution of someone who “willfully causes bodily injury” or “attempts to cause bodily injury.” But such acts are already crimes under state law. What converts the acts targeted by this bill into a federal offense are the thoughts or opinions of the perpetrator alone. Since every violent crime manifests some sort of “hate,” it makes more sense to think of this as a “thought crimes” law.
Hate crimes legislation does not define the class it seeks to protect.
H.R. 1913 does not define the meaning of “sexual orientation” and only loosely defines the term “gender identity,” which means the courts will be left looking to accepted literature like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV in determining a specific definition of sexual orientation. That manual includes disorders like pedophilia as falling under the area of sexual orientations.
The law is an unconstitutional intrusion on the state's right to regulate and punish crimes committed within its borders. Congress does not have the authority to legislate against violent, but non-economic crime. In the 2000 Supreme Court case of U.S. v. Morrison, the Court held very clearly that "The regulation and punishment of intrastate violence that is not directed at the instrumentalities, channels, or goods involved in interstate commerce has always been the province of the states."
Hate crimes legislation paves the way for religious persecution.
Religious leaders and members of religious groups could be prosecuted under the federal “aiding and abetting” statute (18 U.S.C § 2). That law allows for prosecution of anyone who “aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures the commission of a crime” done by another. On any given Sunday morning, there are hundreds, if not thousands of pastors preaching on God's view of sexuality and marriage, and what the Bible has to say about homosexuality. How many hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of people have heard such sermons? Is it possible that one of those millions of listeners at some later point might commit an act of violence against a homosexual person and try to blame it on his pastor's teaching? Of course it is. And that puts the pastor in the crosshairs of this "hate crimes" bill.[2]
Christian speech has been prosecuted under hate crimes laws in other countries.
In Sweden, Canada and Great Britain “hate crimes” laws have been used to prosecute Christians speaking their disapproval of homosexual behavior, posing a serious threat to religious liberty and free speech. Even here in the United States, Christians peacefully protesting a gay pride rally were arrested and jailed in Philadelphia under a local “hate crimes” provision.
